{"text_format":"3","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["表32-本會訴願審議委員會委員性別比例"],"not_rendered":{"external_links":1,"defined_names":1},"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"表32-本會訴願審議委員會委員性別比例","index":0,"n_rows":21,"n_cols":12,"rows_kept":21,"merged":[[0,0,0,11],[1,0,1,11],[2,0,4,0],[2,1,2,5],[2,6,2,8],[2,9,2,11],[3,1,4,1],[3,2,3,3],[3,4,3,5],[3,6,4,6],[3,7,4,7],[3,8,4,8],[3,9,4,9],[3,10,4,10],[3,11,4,11],[20,0,20,11]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
["本會訴願審議委員會委員性別比例"]
["表31"]
["年別","總計",{"$nulls":4},"具法制專長(人數)",null,null,"不具法制專長(人數)"]
[null,"總人數","男",null,"女",null,"小計","男","女","小計","男","女"]
[null,"總人數","人數","比例","人數","比例",null,"男","女","小計","男","女"]
["99年",13,8,{"v":0.6153846153846154,"d":"61.54%"},5,{"v":0.38461538461538464,"d":"38.46%"},11,6,5,2,2,0]
["100年",13,8,{"v":0.6153846153846154,"d":"61.54%"},5,{"v":0.38461538461538464,"d":"38.46%"},11,6,5,2,2,0]
["101年",13,8,{"v":0.6153846153846154,"d":"61.54%"},5,{"v":0.38461538461538464,"d":"38.46%"},11,6,5,2,2,0]
["102年",13,8,{"v":0.6153846153846154,"d":"61.54%"},5,{"v":0.38461538461538464,"d":"38.46%"},10,5,5,3,3,0]
["103年",13,8,{"v":0.6153846153846154,"d":"61.54%"},5,{"v":0.38461538461538464,"d":"38.46%"},10,5,5,3,3,0]
["104年",12,7,{"v":0.5833333333333334,"d":"58.33%"},5,{"v":0.4166666666666667,"d":"41.67%"},10,5,5,2,2,0]
["105年",11,5,{"v":0.45454545454545453,"d":"45.45%"},6,{"v":0.5454545454545454,"d":"54.55%"},9,3,6,2,2,0]
["106年",11,5,{"v":0.45454545454545453,"d":"45.45%"},6,{"v":0.5454545454545454,"d":"54.55%"},9,3,6,2,2,0]
["107年",8,4,{"v":0.5,"d":"50.00%"},4,{"v":0.5,"d":"50.00%"},5,1,4,3,3,0]
["108年",8,4,{"v":0.5,"d":"50.00%"},4,{"v":0.5,"d":"50.00%"},5,1,4,3,3,0]
["109年",9,4,{"v":0.4444444444444444,"d":"44.44%"},5,{"v":0.5555555555555556,"d":"55.56%"},6,2,4,3,2,1]
["110年",10,5,{"v":0.5,"d":"50.00%"},5,{"v":0.5,"d":"50.00%"},7,3,4,3,2,1]
["111年",10,4,{"v":0.4,"d":"40.00%"},6,{"v":0.6,"d":"60.00%"},7,2,5,3,2,1]
["112年",10,4,{"v":0.4,"d":"40.00%"},6,{"v":0.6,"d":"60.00%"},7,2,5,3,2,1]
["資料來源：法規委員會"]
["備註：\n1.性別資料使用：藉由委員性別比率統計，瞭解訴願審議委員會男、女委員組成情形。依行政院及各級行政機關訴願審議委員會組織規程第4條規定，委員應有二分之一以上具有法制專長，任一性別人數不得少於三分之一，故委員之聘派需考量委員專長及案件審議需求，並兼顧性別比例。依112年之統計，委員男女人數比率各達40%以上，符合任一性別達三分之一以上之要求。\n2.應用深化：將男女性別比例納入聘派委員之考量因素，俾兼顧案件審議不同性別之觀點，落實性別平等政策。\n3.未進行國際性別統計比較原因說明：茲考量其他國家政府組織型態、功能任務迥異，爰未能就與本會業務性質與角色功能完全相同之國外政府機關進行國際比較。"]